A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between possible neighbours above the development of a wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation that has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children residence at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Moments report about René Collier plus the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, request to make their spouse and children dwelling. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. Based on the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally residents of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their arranging authorization by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their website, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result areas are matter to strict controls less than European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological consequences, specifically inside a delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging permission, and say the wall, and that is partly constructed, is in the right placement. Their legal crew has characterised the action being an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal preparing disputes, in which views of the sea are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waist-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic with the intensity of the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Get Visible evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water throughout critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the positioning turned Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail with the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is actually a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes beyond what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and problems attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental protection and adherence to planning law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public view, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the world as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few only attempting to produce a family members household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Particular Place of Conservation and say that every one functions are performed according to Experienced information and authorised designs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including coming into The ocean through a storm, never alter the fundamental specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website has become a shorthand description to get a scenario that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between non-public land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier mentioned which the businessman experienced previously been linked to regional advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely distinctive Specialist backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should decide whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging situations. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful charges are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development functions at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, Paul Feely accountant the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental issues such as environmental defense and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre from the dispute stands partially built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. No matter whether it is going to finally be altered, removed, or accomplished as planned will rely upon the court’s findings. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.